OK, so it’s been nearly a month since my last post.
In my defense I have been somewhat busy with pounding the streets in preparation for that 26.2 round London the other weekend.
However I wanted to reassure all my loyal followers (yes both of you ) that the blog will be coming back to life in the next few days and to give some hints at what my next posts will be.
Topics will include the marathon (rather obviously as I don’t think I
couldn’t post about that), the garden, honesty and truth (could be a
bit of an over warm spud), tennis and hopefully lots more.
If I get things in gear, the first of these will be done before the end of the week.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Monday, April 08, 2013
Best of times and the worst of times
Today is one of those days that for a lot of people, especially those
in the UK, will, in years to come, be able to remember what they were
doing when they heard the news. Today is the day that Baroness Thatcher
passed away.
A lot can and has been said about her. As with all people, she did things that many found wrong, and things that many found right. However discussion on at side of things isn’t what I’m looking to focus on. Instead I’m looking at social media again (and I would include blogs like this in the term).
The title I have chosen for this sums up what I have seen on social media in the 6 hours or so it has been since the news was broken that her death had occurred. In that 6 hour spell I have seen public postings that have demonstrated how social media can be used in a positive, constructive way, but also many demonstrations of how social media can be used in a negative and destructive way.
One thing that does make me pause for thought is a quote from a podcast host that I always remember when it comes to the internet. ” ‘Inset name of search engine’ never forgets”. While said in jest, there is an element of truth behind it, not specifically for a search engine, but for the internet in general. Once something is out there on the internet it is very hard to ensure it’s permanent deletion. Even deleted posts can still exist somewhere (as some people have discovered) and we know from news stories the issues that can arise with photographs. Days, maybe months or years, down the line, will people be embarrassed by what they have posted in haste? What would their extended family think about how negatively they use social media? Whereas these arguments used to be raised in relation to certain types of ‘artistic work’, with the age of the internet and expansion of social media, is this another area where people should be encouraged more to think before they act, not just for the benefit of others, but for themselves as well.
A lot can and has been said about her. As with all people, she did things that many found wrong, and things that many found right. However discussion on at side of things isn’t what I’m looking to focus on. Instead I’m looking at social media again (and I would include blogs like this in the term).
The title I have chosen for this sums up what I have seen on social media in the 6 hours or so it has been since the news was broken that her death had occurred. In that 6 hour spell I have seen public postings that have demonstrated how social media can be used in a positive, constructive way, but also many demonstrations of how social media can be used in a negative and destructive way.
One thing that does make me pause for thought is a quote from a podcast host that I always remember when it comes to the internet. ” ‘Inset name of search engine’ never forgets”. While said in jest, there is an element of truth behind it, not specifically for a search engine, but for the internet in general. Once something is out there on the internet it is very hard to ensure it’s permanent deletion. Even deleted posts can still exist somewhere (as some people have discovered) and we know from news stories the issues that can arise with photographs. Days, maybe months or years, down the line, will people be embarrassed by what they have posted in haste? What would their extended family think about how negatively they use social media? Whereas these arguments used to be raised in relation to certain types of ‘artistic work’, with the age of the internet and expansion of social media, is this another area where people should be encouraged more to think before they act, not just for the benefit of others, but for themselves as well.
Friday, April 05, 2013
Off Piste
So I have recently returned from the second of two ski trips. (I
know that sounds extravagant, but it is totally true that if you want to
improve you have to ski more than once a year, but that’s not the point
of the post). I wanted to put something out there about something that
happened on the first trip.
It was the last day (a Friday) and me and a couple of friends were preparing to do our last ‘run’ of the day. It involved having a hot chocolate at a place on the mountains that is one of the last places to get the sun. You then wait for the lifts to stop, and then ski all the way down to the hotel. There’s nothing very dangerous in that, the slopes back down aren’t difficult for a half competent skier.
The hot chocolates were drunk, the lifts stopped, and off we went. The slope started nice and easy, but when we got to the first steep part, we came across someone clambering back up the slope to their skis. In this situation the usual ‘form’ is to help out and make sure the person is ok. I collected the skis, a friend collected the pole he’d dropped and we gave them back. It was then that we discovered there was a problem. The person was as drunk as a skunk (no offense to any skunks that are reading this).
We did, eventually, with the help of a ski restaurant, get him to safety, but the whole situation left me with a few challenges in terms of what is an isn’t acceptable on the slopes.
So the question being posed is whether it is acceptable to drink on the slopes. The chap we found would and should never be allowed to drive given how much he had drunk, yet, there were no restrictions in terms of skiing. He was a risk to himself, and had it been earlier in the day would have been a risk to others. At -15C at night if he’d skied off the piste and collapsed, he wouldn’t have survived.
So, should there be no alcohol allowed on the slopes at all. I was shocked to see that there were a number of places happily selling high %vol miniatures to people on the slopes, with no concern over if they were to be shared or all consumed by one person. That sort of consumption is something that I believe would be unacceptable. So, at first look an alcohol ban would seem logical. However it’s when you move to other drinks that things possibly become a bit more difficult. I’ll freely admit that I have, on occasion, had a gluhwien or a beer with a meal when skiing, but would limit it to that.
Now I like to believe that I’m quite a responsible skier and make sure that I am in control of what I am doing. Some may argue that I’m not being so by having a gluhwien, and I’m willing to accept that some may view it that way. I would though argue there is a difference between that and ‘sinking’ a load of miniatures before skiing.
I’m yet to be convinced that a total ban should be enforced, but having met someone who was a risk to themselves, a ban on alcohol over a certain % would get my support. The person I found on the slopes would certainly have been drinking that rather than a beer or gluhwein given the state he was in.
It was the last day (a Friday) and me and a couple of friends were preparing to do our last ‘run’ of the day. It involved having a hot chocolate at a place on the mountains that is one of the last places to get the sun. You then wait for the lifts to stop, and then ski all the way down to the hotel. There’s nothing very dangerous in that, the slopes back down aren’t difficult for a half competent skier.
The hot chocolates were drunk, the lifts stopped, and off we went. The slope started nice and easy, but when we got to the first steep part, we came across someone clambering back up the slope to their skis. In this situation the usual ‘form’ is to help out and make sure the person is ok. I collected the skis, a friend collected the pole he’d dropped and we gave them back. It was then that we discovered there was a problem. The person was as drunk as a skunk (no offense to any skunks that are reading this).
We did, eventually, with the help of a ski restaurant, get him to safety, but the whole situation left me with a few challenges in terms of what is an isn’t acceptable on the slopes.
So the question being posed is whether it is acceptable to drink on the slopes. The chap we found would and should never be allowed to drive given how much he had drunk, yet, there were no restrictions in terms of skiing. He was a risk to himself, and had it been earlier in the day would have been a risk to others. At -15C at night if he’d skied off the piste and collapsed, he wouldn’t have survived.
So, should there be no alcohol allowed on the slopes at all. I was shocked to see that there were a number of places happily selling high %vol miniatures to people on the slopes, with no concern over if they were to be shared or all consumed by one person. That sort of consumption is something that I believe would be unacceptable. So, at first look an alcohol ban would seem logical. However it’s when you move to other drinks that things possibly become a bit more difficult. I’ll freely admit that I have, on occasion, had a gluhwien or a beer with a meal when skiing, but would limit it to that.
Now I like to believe that I’m quite a responsible skier and make sure that I am in control of what I am doing. Some may argue that I’m not being so by having a gluhwien, and I’m willing to accept that some may view it that way. I would though argue there is a difference between that and ‘sinking’ a load of miniatures before skiing.
I’m yet to be convinced that a total ban should be enforced, but having met someone who was a risk to themselves, a ban on alcohol over a certain % would get my support. The person I found on the slopes would certainly have been drinking that rather than a beer or gluhwein given the state he was in.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)